io.github.byenzyme/enzyme
version 0.12.2
- scanned 2026-10-16
- source github.com/byenzyme/enzyme
- commit f7adff9b3963
- transport stdio
- files read 2
- methodology 0.2.0
- ruleset 0.1.1
100
100measured on 80% of this axis
not assessed
no lockfile in the fetched source; dependency versions are unresolved, so no vulnerability can be attributed
92measured on 90% of this axis
28
The evidence
Every deduction below names the artefact that produced it. Nothing on this page was executed: the source was read, never run, and no running server was contacted.
Auth Posture
- authentication_model
stdio transport: the client launches the server as a subprocess, so the OS process boundary is the auth boundary — `03` §4 does not penalise absent auth here
- transport_security
declared transport: stdio — launched as a subprocess by the client, so the security boundary is the client process, not a network port (`03` §4)
- secret_handling
detect-secrets matched 4 credential-shaped string(s), every one from a keyword or entropy heuristic (Hex High Entropy String). Those flag placeholders, variable names and content hashes as readily as credentials, so they do not establish the committed credential `03` §4's 0 asserts, and this sub-check is not scored; Hex High Entropy String at server.json:16; Hex High Entropy String at server.json:30; Hex High Entropy String at server.json:44; Hex High Entropy String at server.json:58
- authorization_granularity
3 tool registration(s) detected — at or below `03` §4's threshold of 3, so there is no multi-tool surface to segregate
Maintenance
- recency
last commit 9 day(s) before 2026-10-16
- issue_responsiveness
median over 6 issue(s) in the last 6 months: 0.3 day(s) to first maintainer comment
- release_cadence
released 9 day(s) ago (by releases), inside `03` §5's 30-day window
- bus_factor
sole maintainer
- repository_signals
`03` §5 scores this by quartile WITHIN the server's category, which needs a distribution across every scanned server and so cannot be computed while scanning one. It is a post-pass over the crawl and that pass does not exist yet.
Transparency
- license
openclaw/package.json declares 'MIT' but no LICENSE file ships with the source
- readme_quality
README.md: installation instructions (+25), configuration documented (+25), exposed tools or resources enumerated (+30)
- declared_scopes
neither the README nor the MCP manifest documents what the server accesses or what side effects it has
- changelog
no CHANGELOG in the fetched source. `03` §7's partial credit for tagged releases carrying release notes is not applied here — that needs the forge API, which this check does not call
- security_contact
no SECURITY.md and no disclosure contact in the README, so a finder has no route to report a vulnerability privately
Contest a finding
Every number here comes from a rule reading published source, and rules get things wrong. If something on this page is incorrect — or correct but mitigated by a check the rule cannot see — open an issue and we answer it in writing. A finding we got wrong is removed and the rule is fixed; one that stands is answered on the record.
Anyone can file: the maintainer, a researcher who disagrees with the classification, or a user who tested the server and could not reproduce it. Name this server and the rule or advisory ID shown beside the finding above. We aim to reply within five business days and to resolve within ten.